Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - BiduleOhm

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6
61
Software Dev / Re: Improving the Jog Wheel, ideas.
« on: October 14, 2017, 04:26:14 AM »
The problem is that if it's not perfectly implemented and tuned it's a nightmare to use, but I have no doubts on the skills of David so I guess it's a good idea :)

62
Software Dev / Re: Improving the Jog Wheel, ideas.
« on: October 13, 2017, 10:42:44 AM »
Fair enough! Then I would suggest the following based on all the above:

Clicking the jogwheel will switch between the following speed settings:

- Single-step
- Slow
- Normal
- Fast

The textual representation of the currently selected speed would be displayed somewhere on screen during playback such that one gets feedback on what the current setting is when pressing the button.

The % settings for each such mode would have a reasonable set of defaults based on testing, but could optionally be fine-tuned in the camera settings somewhere if one wants to have more fine-control over those speeds.

Having those textual representations will make more sense to the average user, while still being able to be fine-tuned in camera settings if desired (to whatever granularity needed).

That seems pretty much perfect :)

63
Software Dev / Re: Improving the Jog Wheel, ideas.
« on: October 13, 2017, 03:48:17 AM »
I think the press-to-hold-select speed you suggest would be even easier if just using "push to open", "Push to close" the settings window, then you don't need the dexterity to actually press-hold-rotate at the same time. As the currently selected "speed" would be pre-selected when pressing, you can always get rid of the settings easily by just pressing a second time if doing it by mistake.

I think it'll not be very pratical to select a value from a menu each time you want to switch it, I much prefer to set the values once and be able to switch between them with just a click.

But thinking about it, with the possible exception of single-frame stepping, wouldn't one always want to use a fraction of the buffer length (%) as the speed selection?

Yep, pretty much exactly what I was thinking earlier ;)

The actual % above probably are good, but real-world experience needed to nail them down

I'm afraid using percentages isn't precise enough (we might need 0.0x % values for example) but I may be wrong.

64
Software Dev / Re: Improving the Jog Wheel, ideas.
« on: October 12, 2017, 05:46:20 AM »
1. Yep, exactly what I was thinking ;)

2. Yes, the best thing would be to be able to chose between 2 and 5 values for example.

I guess you can always have a 'default' preset with sensible values for those who just want to use the camera as is.

3. Also it would be great to be able to use the jog wheel when focused on an input field to increment/decrement the value of the field (especially as a lot of inputs are numbers) and validate the value with a click. It would be a lot easier than with the current keyboard where you can mis-type values (even if I don't have fat fingers... :P) and you need a lot of clicks.

65
Software Dev / Re: Improving the Jog Wheel, ideas.
« on: October 12, 2017, 04:31:40 AM »
1. One frame per click is too-fine. Most people only care about getting close enough to the section of the frame buffer they need to save. You want to have handles on your video anyway, so you will save a little bit before the area of interest and a little bit afterwards, 5-10 seconds is what most people I have seen recommend. If people need to go over video frame by frame they will typically do this later when on a PC with a large monitor.

2. Holding the jog wheel down while turning is impractical. If this was a jog wheel on a desk or control panel there would be no problem, but this is a camera on a tripod or handheld.
[...]
I personally think push and hold needs to be abandoned, instead pushing and releasing the jog wheel cycles through the jog rates.

1. I do not agree, I like to be able to see the video frame by frame for the critical moments before saving it in case something is wrong and I need to re-shoot the video.

2. I totally agree, push and releasing is the way to go IMHO. If possible with more than 2 frame-rates (3 or 4 would be a good balance I think). I really like the idea of fractions of the buffer in addition to one frame per detent.

Instead of presets for the whole thing I guess it would be better to be able to chose a preset for each click on the jog wheel; less presets needed, more customizable and maybe no need for an advanced mode because we can already do advanced things with this simple UI.


66
Chronos User Discussion / Re: Recommended Lens brands...etc....
« on: October 11, 2017, 11:56:16 AM »
That's pretty much exactly my plan: using a F-mount to C-mount adapter and some Nikon lens (the first one will probably be a 35 mm prime) and also the 12.5-75 mm Computar C-mount lens ;)

I already have the 12.5-75 lens and the adapter, now I need to hunt for a cheap Nikon lens :)

67
Chronos User Discussion / Re: C moutn adapotor
« on: October 08, 2017, 03:13:14 AM »
Of course I already adjusted the back focus, I have the lens rotated about 90° of what it should (I guess it's better than before the back focus adjustment where it was nearly 180° out, but it's still very annoying) but I can't correct it with the back focus adjustment because it would throw off the back focus.

68
Chronos User Discussion / Re: C moutn adapotor
« on: October 07, 2017, 04:37:30 AM »
Quote
Some lenses such as the Computar 12.5-75mm can be rotated relative to the mount to correct this, by loosening a black ring near the lens mount.

Do you know the correct way to unscrew the rear ring because mine seems to be very very tight and I don't want to put force on the focus/zoom/exposure mechanical stops (unless it's the right way to do this) so it's hard to grab the body of the lens.

69
Chronos User Discussion / Re: List of good (and bad) SD cards
« on: September 26, 2017, 06:26:13 PM »
I tried this one and it didn't work for me.

70
Chronos User Discussion / Re: List of good (and bad) SD cards
« on: September 26, 2017, 03:37:09 AM »
I used a third party software to format the card in FAT32 (it worked fine on a Lexar 633x 64GB for reference), I can't remember the name but as soon as I go home I'll post it ;)

Edit: I used EaseUS Partition Master on windows 7.

71
Chronos User Discussion / Re: Need a tutorial on shutter speed
« on: September 13, 2017, 03:47:24 AM »
The more you play with the camera,  the better.   I would suggest using the largest aperture,  set your focus,  then increase the speed of the shutter which will darken the imagery.   

The problem is that you'll have a very soft image because of the large aperture. I've done a few videos and I found a good compromise is to put the shutter to 40-50 % and then use the aperture to set the exposition correctly ;)

72
Chronos User Discussion / Re: Best Save-As frame rate?
« on: September 13, 2017, 03:42:50 AM »
Usually it's easier to speed it up than to slow it down later.

I'll also use 30 fps most of the time; and The Slow Mo Guys generally play theirs videos at 25 fps to have the maximum hi-speed/slow speed ratio and so have the best resolution possible (for example 2000 fps played at 30 fps will be seen as the same speed than 4000 fps played at 60 fps but you'll have a far higher resolution at 2000 fps, and you'll need less light too).

73
Chronos User Discussion / Re: Full user manual is out
« on: August 15, 2017, 04:01:19 AM »
Very nice manual, I love the "Do not expose the camera to molten metal." part ;D

I wonder about one thing: as far as I understand the black cal for a given resolution, framerate, etc... is saved and if later you use the same settings it's not necessary to redo a black cal. If that's the case then is there an indicator somewhere to tell you if a black has been done in the past, or if not and you should do one?

74
Chronos User Discussion / Re: Let's talk LENSES!
« on: July 24, 2017, 11:32:21 AM »
What's their camera side mount?

75
Chronos User Discussion / Re: Let's talk LENSES!
« on: July 23, 2017, 10:07:34 AM »
Yeah I found this one too but it's for a 1.25" telescope mount, I don't think it'll be very useful here unfortunately.

Yes, if you can find the proper reducer then it'll work no problem. The main problem is to find one for a C or CS mount and where we can mount a Canon/Nikon lens (EF or F mount) on the other side even if we need another adapter. For now I only found 1.25" to C mount reducer or some DSLR to another DSLR reducer.

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6