General > General high-speed discussion

First shots with the early bird camera!

<< < (2/3) > >>

Max:
Quite interesting, I personally have not used the camera for anything other they controlled scientific events.
The flag is quite interesting, especially how you can see the waves going through it.

Cheers,
Max

gyppor:
Here's another one. Really liking the camera... a LOT...  :D

Tiny bees playing leaf blower with some pollen, slowed down 155 times (4653fps):

https://youtu.be/ckwfTcNMbv4

And as a bonus, a cherry tomato blowing up at 6600fps:

https://youtu.be/7dE0Vh5DnSI

Very good image quality at these frame rates, I'm impressed.

G

nik282000:
Very cool footage, I was hoovering it up as you started posting the other day.

This is literally the first thing I got it pointed at since opening the box. The bottle is full of steam which condenses back to water leaving a strong vacuum that then draws in the water, 800x420 @ 4k-ish fps. I still need to spend a lot of time practicing getting colour and exposure correct. I also need to replace my now-exploded home depot LED light, apparently they don't like 1.41x their rated voltage even for a short period of time.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CRDdCLMIkvk

nik282000:
It was bright enough to do some outdoor shooting today, good think I had plenty of cold beer.

https://youtu.be/Y0Nxhfqi9WI

Simon:
What's the softness due to in most high speed videos I see?

Say for instance this loseless screengrab of the raw ducks mp4:



Link as forum software appears to scale up: http://i.imgur.com/FFM7luc.png

Is it from:

* mp4 compression?
* quality of lens?
* insufficient lighting for faster exposure?
* focus?
The duck at the back is obviously blurrier due to depth of field.

Or is this typical of normal shots in cameras before the camera sharpens?

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version