Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - fzigunov

Pages: [1]
1
Chronos User Discussion / Re: Frame straddling for PIV
« on: October 13, 2023, 02:17:12 PM »
Ok, I was able to get a response from Mike Tymofie at Krontech. Here's the frame straddling times for the two Chronos cameras:

Chronos 1.4 - 5.56 us
Chronos 2.1 - 6.67 us


These are calculated times, according to him. I am not sure what that means but I'd like to try it in practice. At least now I can plan my PIV experiments, and I believe these times are acceptable for moderate flow speeds (say, up to ~100m/s or so depending on magnification and other aspects). Say, at 100m/s a particle would move 0.7mm in 7us. If we're doing cross-plane Stereo PIV, that is as much you would want (about 25% of the ~3mm light sheet). So, unfortunately, no supersonic flows  :-\

I'll let you know more when I get my hands on one and I have a laser available to test it.

Hope this helps somebody in the future!

2
Chronos User Discussion / Re: Frame straddling for PIV
« on: October 11, 2023, 07:52:39 AM »
Hi, I'm sorry but these answers are not what I'm looking for. I am not interested in the time to save from camera memory to storage or encoding/processing times.

I'm asking about the time required to transfer a frame from the sensor to the internal camera RAM while it is recording. During this time the camera cannot start exposing the next frame because it hasn't downloaded the current frame yet. This time is the most limiting factor in the particle image velocimetry application and is called "frame straddling time". High-end cameras like Phantom cameras provide this info in their datasheet. Since Chronos advertises themselves as suitable for PIV, I was hoping they would provide this info.

And yes, I sent them an e-mail a month ago and have not heard yet.

3
Chronos User Discussion / Frame straddling for PIV
« on: October 02, 2023, 09:33:46 PM »
Hi, everyone,

I think this question has already been asked but nobody has answered it previously with an actual number (from my research). For a particle image velocimetry application, we typically use a double-pulse laser to capture two consecutive frames at an arbitrary interval to measure velocity of a cloud of particles. These lasers typically have two individually-controlled heads that each can send a short (20-200ns long) pulse of light. In these applications, we typically expose the camera frame for as long as possible and control the illumination timing to get velocity measurements. But all cameras have a finite time required to download the frame from the sensor to a buffer before starting exposing the next frame. This information is not provided anywhere I can find for the Chronos camera (both versions).

As an example, if you sample at 1000fps the time between frames is 1ms but the exposure has to be (1ms - download time) at most. Therefore, the time between laser 1 and laser 2 has to be at least (download time + pulse length). This technique is called frame straddling in the field and enables the use of "low speed" cameras for high speed flows where the inter-laser time can be as low as 1us for some flows (depending on speed and magnification).

Anyone that has this experience with the Chronos, could you inform what is the minimum "download time" possible? Have you done any tests? I just wanted to know that info before committing to purchasing it.

Thanks!

Pages: [1]