Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - aaronkondziela

Pages: [1]
1
I see like zero evidence of over-sharpening, so whatever you set it at certainly did the trick. Higher res sensor would rock for a next gen camera! This is juuuust good enough to slap into an HD production if everything was set up right.

2
Hey, that turned out to be quite nice! Even the noise characteristic is decent, closer to a film grain feel than digital noise, and probably easily tamed if needed. Thanks for grading it, I now have more confidence this cam could be used in a video production, and not just an engineering context! It's juuust good enough if everything is well-planned and executed.  :D :D :D

4
I pulled a couple individual DNGs out if you want to play with em.

Will do more lens tests if I get time this weekend and the weather cooperates...

6
Yeah I was honestly surprised too at the Computar, it was better than previous results I've gotten. Likely because I mostly shot it wide-open or close to it, gobbling up studio light for the Chronos. It's not good wide open =)


7
Here's a quickie youtubes of the h.264 from camera, untouched:

https://youtu.be/eShJElxUiZY

8
If someone could be so kind to either film under studio lighting or failing that, get me some static shots of a subject on a cloudy day, so the shadows (dark areas) are fairly well exposed and no clipped highlights. Just a quick few seconds worth of frames ie 100 or so. If I could get the raw image data and some dng's even better and I will try a variety of debayering methods.

Pritchboxer,

Having a cine background, your request intrigued me. So, I just shot some test footage for you! Here's what I have:

Camera using latest firmware, and the debayer beta patch.

Lens #1:
SMC Pentax-A 645 Macro 120mm f/4
This is one of the best lenses I have. Razor sharp with no CA or coma to speak of.

Lens #2:
Computar TV Zoom Lens 12.5-75 f/1.2 - set at about 45mm on the zoom
This is the C-mount that's popular for Chronos users. In my opinion it's pretty crap optical quality, but it's small and works well for technical shooting.

Both shots are 1280x1024 @ 1052fps (or whatever that first fps choice is). I blackshaded after a 20-minute camera warmup.

Both shots are in direct sunlight from a cloudless sky, reasonably well-composed including green foliage, a pink/magenta flower with yellow pistils, some bokeh in the background, and some little bugs flying around for slomo effect. Should be a reasonably wide dynamic range in the shot to work with.

Exposure was done at f/6.3 on both lenses, and the shutter was set at about 180 degrees like you'd do for a cine shoot. This got the highlights to be just under the zebras with only a tiny bit of headroom for light variance. Without a raw histogram or raw clip indicators on the RGB channels, this is as close as I could get to exposed as far right as possible for maximum quality.

I saved both as RAW and h.264 (using camera default settings)

Would you like the files to color grade?

Edit: Also shot xrite color charts with each lens (note color chart shot on computar was using a crap 2x macro converter because I was lazy. shouldn't affect colors tho)

9
Software Dev / Re: Updating the UI: Play & Save Edition
« on: April 04, 2018, 03:20:30 PM »
Another random thought on the frame preview strip:

Perhaps a histogram-type display that indicates the variance in the frame. Base it from the first frame, or a moving average behind current. Overlay on the averaged strip, as a line chart.

Half-baked, just tossing it out there =)

10
Chronos User Discussion / Re: Chronos 1.4 Footage Thread
« on: December 13, 2017, 05:10:32 PM »
Diagnosed a mechanical problem with a typewriter using Chronos, decided to turn it into a video. Loving this camera!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CC0LSqeR75E

=)

11
Software Dev / Re: Improving the Jog Wheel, ideas.
« on: December 13, 2017, 05:07:23 PM »
For my part, I find the hold-and-turn feature of the jogwheel very natural and a great interface. It seemed weird at first, but I find it quite easy to give it a little heavier push at the edge of the knob, vs a ligher spin at the side, and it feels great.

In addition to that, the suggestions I see people put forth here would make some great additions.

And I agree with BiduleOhm on the tuning of acceleration on knobs... When done right it's amazingly great and useful, but I almost *never* like the feel of it. I would go for the configurable speeds and stuff before acceleration, for sure.

Pages: [1]