here's a new clip 1k fps at 1920x1080: https://youtu.be/T0FSl5ORMEM
and here's one at 5k fps at 640x480: https://youtu.be/8xpxutVUQTg
i don't think the 2.1 can do any faster than 5k. i believe the 1.4 can do 20k at a low resolution. it's kind of a bummer that the 2.1 can't do that. i'm assuming that's a software limitation.
Well, you will have to lower the resolution even more, to get higher Framerates (That is just the way highspeedcameras work... Total number of Pixels of a Frame multiplied by time will stay mostly constant, so lower Resolution = Faster). Look at the datasheet! 2.1 can do over 20kfps if you turn down the Resolution enough. The 1.4 can do over 30kfps, that is a Sensor thing though.
Thanks for the other two clips! The new 1000 fps one looks way more sharp!
1000fps at 993,23 µs would mean an shutter angle of about 358°, according to my calculator. Just think of it in terms of an percentage of possible exposure. 1000 fps means, that frames will be captured in 1/1000s = 1 ms = 1000µs intervalls. if the exposure would be 360° now (the theoretical maximum, most time not possible in the real world due to Hardware Limitations), the Image would be exposed all the way through till the camera would start to expose the next image. 180° would be half the time exposure and so on. The Thing about shutter angle is, that if you will change the Framerate, your motion blur will still look similar, no matter what framerate it is shot at, when you play it back at normal speed. (Hope this explained the Shutter angle thing a bit, and didnt cause more confusion...).
.
Also, if this is at gain 0 in that new 1000fps clip, you either got a very well lit Tap or the 2.1 is just that good in low light!
